As a call center manager, it’s important to distinguish between problems that are caused by workplace environment factors and those that result from employee-specific issues.
For example, if the ideal number of calls handled by an agent per hour is 15, but the reports show an agent is handling 19 calls per hour.
On further drilling down on the agent’s performance, you realize that he’s sacrificing quality at the expense of quantity. What do you do?
Anytime an agent doesn’t perform how they are expected to perform; it’s often because of 4 main reasons:
At Call Criteria, we’ve realized that poor performance because of a lack of knowledge of expected behaviors is common with new agents.
So if the agent doesn’t know what is expected, the agent needs to be coached on the level of performance expected, how performance will be measured, what is measured, who counts, and who provides feedback.
But most importantly, you need to explain why.
Why every single agent needs to adhere to the performance requirements and the consequences of what happens when the performance requirements are met and when the expectations are not met, therefore, you’ll need to reiterate this message right from when you are interviewing and periodically as a reminder throughout your interactions.
An agent may perform poorly because they know what is expected, but they do not get information that their performance does not measure up to the expected performance.
You might consider empowering the agents with self-coaching tools.
That’s why Call Criteria QA services provide visual performance reports to show what’s happening in the call center, allowing both agents and coaches to get real-time feedback on the expected performance.
Some agents fail to perform as expected because of environmental obstacles. As you think about your call center agents, what obstacles do you think to prevent them from performing as expected?
Maybe they are not the right fit; perhaps they don’t have the right resources, they are not quick to adapt to new systems/software, etc.
And this is precisely why you need to be clear on what you expect regarding performance; there are only too many obstacles.
In this case, the agent knows what is expected of them, they have been getting feedback on their performance, and they don’t have any physical restrictions, but they still won’t perform as expected.
Such cases are primarily about consequences. Either there are no consequences, or there are mismatched consequences.
The agent may be getting positive reinforcement for negative behavior.
For example, even though the agent has been handling 19 calls per hour and is making more sales, hurrying through calls, and leaving customers feeling mishandled will affect the qualitative score.
Therefore the agent should not be reinforced positively just because the sales figures are good.
The treatment for this diagnosis would involve identifying the right reinforcements for each agent based on their current performance and understanding the different characteristics of consequences.
Once you diagnose the challenges affecting your call center’s performance, it is crucial to seek your supervisor’s and team leaders’ input about the problem.
More often than not, they will have suggestions that can help you further pinpoint the cause.
You should also ask for feedback directly from agents for both individual and general performance issues.
But most importantly, you should consider working with a third-party quality assurance team like Call Criteria to save time, and costs and avoid biased reports.
When you’re discussing poor agent performance, the best approach is to talk about the performance itself, rather than the person.
Making a call center performance problem personal can lead to resentment — and instead of improving performance, you may end up losing valuable agents.